Download A Life and Death Decision: A Jury Weighs the Death Penalty by Scott E. Sundby PDF

By Scott E. Sundby

With a existence within the stability, a jury convicts a guy of homicide and now has to choose no matter if he could be positioned to dying. Twelve humans now face a momentous choice.
Bringing drama to lifestyles, A existence and dying determination supplies special perception into how a jury deliberates. We believe the passions, anger, and depression because the jurors grapple with criminal, ethical, and private dilemmas. The jurors' voices are compelling. From the idealist to the "holdout," the person stories―of how and why they voted for all times or death―drive the narrative. The reader is true there siding with one or one other juror during this riveting read.
From videos to novels to tv, juries fascinate. concentrating on a unmarried case, Sundby sheds gentle on broader concerns, together with the jobs of race, classification, and gender within the justice process. With loss of life penalty instances continuously within the information, this is often a big window on how actual jurors planned a few urgent nationwide issue.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Life and Death Decision: A Jury Weighs the Death Penalty PDF

Best rules & procedures books

Judicial Power and American Character: Censoring Ourselves in an Anxious Age

This unique paintings is an strange attempt to narrate sleek constitutional politics to the ethical personality of yankee tradition. Writing in non-technical language, Nagel demonstrates how judicial judgements embrace wider social developments towards ethical evasiveness, privatization, and opportunism. He exhibits that constitutional interpretation is usually used to stifle political war of words and, eventually, to censor our personal ideals and traditions.

Third Party Liability in Tort

Non-vicarious legal responsibility for the acts of 3rd events is distinguishable from the normal doctrine of vicarious legal responsibility insofar because it pertains to a sort of fundamental legal responsibility predicated upon the non-public fault of the defendant. extra very easily termed 'third occasion liability', it's a novel classification of tortious legal responsibility that has developed from a suite of disparate and remoted judicial judgements starting up, on a completely advert hoc foundation, individualized exceptions to the entrenched universal legislation ideas opposed to legal responsibility for omissions and legal responsibility for the acts of others.

Extra info for A Life and Death Decision: A Jury Weighs the Death Penalty

Example text

During this entire process, Ken was acutely aware of Peggy and wondering if she was going to hold together. The time had arrived for the judge to ask each juror individually whether he or she joined in the verdict. Peggy’s turn came and went in a second, her “Yes, I do” uneventful except to the other jurors, who exchanged glances of relief among themselves. They had made it. The jury’s work was done: The holdout had been persuaded, Steven Lane had been sentenced to death, and the verdict was in.

And although all five identified themselves as belonging to a church, none of them professed to be particularly religious or involved with their churches. Indeed, the only juror of the group who said that her religious beliefs had a significant impact on her decision was the one who no longer attended church at all. 30 / A L I F E A N D D E AT H D E C I S I O N As a group, the Chorus presented a picture of stability and middleclass sensibility whose lives largely revolved around their families and their jobs.

Although Ken had hoped that this lone juror—a woman named Peggy—could be persuaded quickly now that she stood alone, she was to prove quite an obstacle to reaching the unanimous verdict required by law. ” Ken saw Peggy as someone who was unable to separate out her own emotions from her duty to evaluate the evidence. He attributed this in part to her being younger and to her job as a social worker. Ken’s assumptions were ones widely shared by many jurors (and also by many trial attorneys) that younger individuals and those with certain jobs, such as social workers, nurses, humanities professors, and elementary school teachers, tend to be soft-hearted.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.10 of 5 – based on 23 votes